Do we have a good reason to believe in existence of a "higher power"?Speaks of Transcendentalism

        We do non have good reasons to count in nearlything transcendental. almost of the arguments in favor of idol, or a so-c all in alled higher(prenominal) power are ground on faith and emotion, and not a clear logical argument. In fact, these arguments are often in favor of throwing logic out the window. In many tracks, this psyche is akin(predicate) to someone attempting to render the globe of an invisible elephant. It is far easier to prove that the elephant does not exist than it is to prove that it does.         Socrates principle of examination states that we must carefully examine all things. The tools we humans use to do this are logic and the scientific method. In order to believe in something transcendental, you cannot examine your beliefs using logic and science. If you do, there is no way to prove the globe of a higher power.         The base argument against the origination of a Judeo-Christian omniscient, a ll-powerful, righteous God is the argument from evil. This argument argues against the straw man of a higher power using facts of ordinary life. This argument states that most would go that some of the pain and suffering (evil) in this world is un undeniable. To be considered a necessary evil, the occurrence must be the just now way to cite something good, which outweighs the evil.

Many events, such as baby deaths, would not be classified in this category.         If such an all-knowing deity existed, it states, He would know that this evil was occurring. If He was all-powerful, He would have the power to forfeit this ev il. If He was righteous, He would stop the e! vil from occurring Therefore, the existence of evil cannot be compatible with the existence of this type of God.         The primary response to the argument from evil is the accost to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay